you have the possibility to publish an article related to the theme of this page, and / or to this region:
India - -An information and promotions platform.
Links the content with your website for free.
India - Web content about Manish Sisodia
The Supreme Court on Friday (August 9, 2024) granted bail to Mr.
Sisodia in cases registered against him by the ED and CBI in connection with the now-scrapped Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.
A Bench comprising Justices B.
R.
Gavai and K.
V.
Viswanathan acknowledged Mr.
Sisodia’s right to a speedy trial, noting his 17-month-long incarceration and the ongoing delay in the commencement of the trial.
The court ordered the AAP leader to submit a bail bond of ₹10 lakh with two sureties, surrender his passport, and report to the Investigating Officer twice a week—on Mondays and Thursdays.
He was also instructed not to attempt to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence.
The judges also declined the ED’s oral request to restrict Mr.
Sisodia from visiting the Delhi Secretariat or the Chief Minister’s office as was done in the case of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, when to campaign for the Lok Sabha elections.
While the CBI arrested Mr.
Sisodia under the Prevention of Corruption Act on February 26 last year, the ED arrested him under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) on March 9 of the same year.
The Delhi High Court on May 30 refused bail to the former Deputy CM on June 4.
However, the Bench gave the AAP leader the liberty to “revive” his plea for bail, afresh, once the central agencies have filed the final chargesheet/prosecution complaint, respectively, in the case.
The court had on June 4 also recorded an undertaking from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for both the CBI and the ED, that the final charge-sheet/prosecution complaint, signaling the completion of investigation in the excise policy case, would be filed in the trial court on or before July 3, 2024.
Justice Gavai expressly declined an oral plea by ED/CBI to bar Mr.
Sisodia from the Delhi Secretariat.
Additional Solicitor General S.
V.
Raju sought liberty to move SC for cancellation of bail if Mr.
Sisodia comes to his former office.
SC did not specifically address the issue.
Only said that there is hardly any possibility of Sisodia fleeing the country or tampering with the evidence.
SC observed that the procedure should not become the punishment and that the right to bail should not suffer due to delay in trial.
“A citizen cannot be made to run from pillar to post for bail.
Sisodia cannot again start from square one, the trial court, and climb up the ladder till the Supreme Court for bail.
Grant of bail is not a snake and ladder game”, the judges asserted.
SC granted the former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister bail in both ED and CBI cases in the excise policy case.
Ordered him to be released on payment of ₹10 lakh in bail bonds.
He has to surrender his passport and report to the police station every Monday.
Not to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.
SC noted that the AAP leader has suffered incarceration of 17 months and that the trial has not yet commenced.
Dismissing the contentions of the ED and CBI that the delay in the trial can be attributed to Mr.
Sisodia, Justice Gavai said, “When we specifically asked the ASG to show any order where the trial Court found any application to be frivolous, not one was shown.
We find that the finding of delay by the appellant is not supported by the record.
” The judge added that it cannot be expected that the accused will not need reasonable time to inspect documents.
SC said that the impugned orders of the trial court and the High Court have not taken into consideration the delay in trial.
It underscored that the rigours of (grounds for bail) can be relaxed when there has been prolonged incarceration of the accused.
SC said that relegating the Deputy CM to the trial court for relief would be a “travesty of justice”.
“A citizen cannot be made to run from pillar to post.
June 4 order recorded that it did not go into merits.
.
.
Procedures cannot be made a mistress of justice”, Justice Gavai said while dismissing the central agencies’ preliminary objections to the bail pleas.
Justice Gavai noted that the Supreme Court in its order on June 4 had recorded an undertaking from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for both the CBI and the ED, that the final chargesheet/prosecution complaint would be filed in the trial court on or before July 3, 2024.
Mr.
S.
V.
Raju appearing on behalf of the ED and CBI said the delay came from the accused, (Mr.
Sisodia) who had sought one document after the other in court.
“Our trial would have commenced and these documents were unwarranted but just because of these applications.
Delay is completely attributable to them and not to the agency.
Speedy trial cannot be fitted in a straightjacket formula.
It is case-by-case basis and they do not want this to be heard on merits.
So the best option [for them] is to delay it,” Mr.
Raju apprised the Supreme Court.
But Justice Viswanathan replied that had the accused been on bail, he would have tried to delay the trial.
But that was not the case here.
“Delay may happen on their (the accused side) part if they are bail,” Justice Viswanathan reasoned.
Mr.
Raju said the accused could also deliberately delay the trial and use the situation to seek bail.
The law officer said that among the 400-odd witnesses, the ED could have the important ones to testify first.
The Supreme Court noted that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has to establish an unbroken chain of evidence linking in the excise scam case.
“You have to establish a chain.
The money has to flow from the liquor lobby to the person.
We know it is difficult to establish the chain as everything is done undercover…but that is where your competence lies,” Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who headed the Bench, addressed Additional Solicitor General S.
V.
Raju, appearing for the ED.
The court observed that except a statement made by businessman Dinesh Arora, an accused-turned-approver in the case, there was no proof against Mr.
Sisodia.
The Delhi High Court on May 30 rejected bail plea of former, arrested in connection with, noting there are “serious allegations of misconduct” against him.
Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said that statement of the concerned excise officers have been relied upon by the CBI in connection with its probe into the case.
The CBI had arrested Mr.
Sisodia for alleged corruption in the formulation and implementation of the now-scrapped Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 on February 26 following several rounds of questioning.
On February 26, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested Manish Sisodia—Number 2 in both the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Delhi government—and he has remained in jail since then.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has named former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia as an accused in a 2,371-page chargesheet in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case.
In its fifth chargesheet, filed before a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Delhi, the probe agency named Mr.
Sisodia the 29th accused in the alleged liquor scam.
It has called the former Deputy CM a “key conspirator” in the case.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has named former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia as an accused in a 2,371-page chargesheet in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Sunday arrested Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia following his over seven-hour questioning in connection with the allegation of irregularities in the formulation and implementation of the 2021-22.
The agency, in a statement, said: “…he gave evasive replies and did not cooperate in the investigation despite being confronted with evidence to the contrary.
Therefore, he has been arrested.
.
.
the arrested accused will be produced before the designated court, Delhi [on Monday].
” The move triggered a sharp reaction from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) which accused the BJP of getting Mr.
Sisodia arrested in a “false” case.
AAP blames the BJP for the arrest, terms it “a conspiracy to stop Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s revolution”.
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences.
They cannot be abusive or personal.
Please abide by our for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform.
If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles.
If you do not have an account please register and log in to post comments.
Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.