– Conspiracy Thinking– Hostile Intent– Us vs.

Them Mentality– Extreme Language– Misinterpretation and Generalization– References to Specific IndividualsThese points suggest that the writer may be experiencing paranoid thoughts, characterized by distrust, suspicion, and a belief in hidden threats.

It’s impressive, and quite honestly, the quality is already usable.

Yes, when you know you are looking at an AI-generated video in best quality, you will see background glitches or whatever.

But now change the context and the platform.

A video reuploaded on social media on a smartphone, and the glitches are gone (well, pass as encoding artifact).

As for the context, well, it depends on what the sender is willing to tell.

And if it’s a reupload, fat chance you even know it’s an AI-generated content.

I don’t judge here the usage of this tech (is it good or bad), I just point out that all the defaults talked about earlier are moot in daily usage.

“Obvious visual imperfections”… Obvious to who? Half the US can’t see what is right in front of them, or disbelieves it when they see it.

Do you really think some visual imperfection will enter into their thought processes? Or enter in a linear manner? I can see it now—“visual imperfections were added to the recording to make us think that the video was AI-generated….

”I wonder if the algorithm would work for animals? I’d love to see a singing ‘possum or a tardigrade.

By using our website and services, you expressly agree to the placement of our performance, functionality, and advertising cookies.